Logourl black
From our private database of 13,800+ case briefs...

Coopers & Lybrand v. Livesay

United States Supreme Court
437 U.S. 463 (1978)


Facts

Coopers & Lybrand (defendant) certified financial statements of Punta Gorda Isles (Punta Gorda) in a 1972 prospectus issued before securities of Punta Gorda were publicly offered. The following year, Punta Gorda restated downward two years of earnings reported in the prospectus. Cecil and Dorothy Livesay (plaintiffs) purchased Punta Gorda securities on the basis of the prospectus and lost $2,650 upon selling those securities after the restatement. On behalf of themselves and a class of other similarly situated persons, the Livesays sued Coopers & Lybrand and others (collectively, defendants), alleging violations of federal securities laws. The district court initially certified the class but later decertified it. The Livesays appealed the court’s decertification of the class under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, which authorized appeals of “final decisions” made by district courts. The court of appeals concluded that the district court’s decertification decision was appealable as a final decision because it effectively sounded the “death knell” to the case. The court of appeals reasoned that because the Livesays’ claim was small, they were unlikely to pursue an independent action and then challenge the issue of class decertification after that individual action reached final judgment. The court of appeals reversed the district court’s decertification of the class. Coopers & Lybrand petitioned the Supreme Court for certiorari.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Stevens, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 170,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.