Logourl black
From our private database of 13,000+ case briefs...

Craig v. Lake Asbestos

United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
843 F.2d 145 (1988)


Facts

Clarence Craig (plaintiff) was exposed to asbestos while working at a plant owned by Owens-Corning (defendant). Craig and his wife sued Owens Corning, as well as all the companies that provided asbestos to Owens-Corning, for personal injury damages. Most of these entities settled with the Craigs. One, North American Asbestos Corporation (NAAC), was dismissed from the case because it had dissolved. Another, Lake Asbestos of Quebec, Inc. (LAQ) (defendant) settled conditionally, maintaining its right to contribution from two affiliates of NAAC, Cape Industries (Cape) (defendant) and Charter Consolidated, PLC (Charter) (defendant). Cape was the parent corporation of NAAC and held all its shares. Cape, however, was judgment-proof; it held no assets in the United States and other plaintiffs had failed to reach its assets in Britain. Charter owned 67 percent of Cape’s stock and nominated three of Cape’s 10-member board of directors. Cape generally consulted Charter on major financial and management decisions. Cape’s CEO regularly updated Charter on Cape’s progress. Cape, however, on at least some occasions made decisions without consulting Charter. Cape and Charter also maintained separate books and records and consulted separate accountants. The Craigs and LAQ argued that Cape’s veil should be pierced and Charter should be held directly liable for Cape’s (and NAAC’s) actions. The trial court agreed. Charter appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Sloviter, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 129,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,000 briefs, keyed to 177 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.