Credit Alliance Corp. v. Arthur Andersen & Co.

Court of Appeals of New York
483 N.E.2d 110 (N.Y. 1985)


Facts

This decision involves two consolidated appeals regarding accountants’ liability for negligently preparing financial reports. The first is Credit Alliance, where Arthur Andersen & Co. (Andersen) (defendant) prepared financial statements for L.B. Smith, who in turn furnished the reports to his lender, Credit Alliance Corp. (Credit Alliance) (plaintiff) for the purpose of getting a loan. Credit Alliance alleged that the statements were inaccurate. Smith did not hire Andersen to prepare the reports specifically for getting a loan or specifically to be reviewed by Credit Alliance, and there is no evidence that Andersen had any direct dealing with Credit Alliance. Credit Alliance brought suit against Andersen nonetheless for negligent preparation of the reports. Andersen filed a motion to dismiss the claim which was denied by the trial court. The denial was affirmed by the appellate court. Andersen appealed. The second appeal came from European American Bank & Trust Co. v. Strahs & Kaye. In Strahs & Kaye, Strahs & Kaye (S & K) (defendant) prepared financial reports for Majestic Electro Industries (Majestic). European American Bank (EAB) (plaintiff) relied on those financial reports to make substantial loans to Majestic. S & K knew that the primary, if not only reason it was hired to audit Majestic was to give the results to EAB. In addition, EAB and S & K communicated regularly to discuss Majestic’s financial situation. Subsequently, Majestic went bankrupt. EAB brought suit against S & K for negligently preparing the reports. The trial court dismissed the complaint. The appellate court reversed. S & K appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is for members only. To access this section, please login or give Quimbee a try, it's free to get started.

Issue

The issue section is for members only and includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, please login or give Quimbee a try, it's free to get started.

Holding and Reasoning (Jasen, J.)

The holding and reasoning section is for members only and includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please login or give Quimbee a try, it's free to get started.

Here's why 10,000 law students rely on our case briefs:

  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners not other law students.
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet.
  • 7,515 briefs - keyed to 85 casebooks.
  • Uniform format for every case brief.
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language.
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions.
  • Ability to tag case briefs in an outlining tool.
  • Top-notch customer support.
Start Your Free Trial Now