Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Crews v. W.A. Brown & Son, Inc.

North Carolina Court of Appeals
416 S.E.2d 924 (1992)


Facts

Calvary Baptist Church (Calvary) (defendant) purchased a walk-in freezer from Foodcraft (defendant). Foodcraft purchased the parts for the freezer from the freezer’s manufacturer, W.A. Brown & Son, Inc. (Brown) (defendant). Foodcraft then assembled the walk-in freezer on-site at Calvary. The freezer’s door came pre-assembled with inside and outside releases. After assembly, Foodcraft tested the door latch and found that it worked properly. Several months later, Vickie Crews (Crews) (plaintiff) was volunteering at Calvary. Crews thought she heard a noise coming from the freezer, and she walked inside. The door closed behind her. Crews tried to open the freezer door using the inside release, but she could not trigger the latch. More than an hour passed before Crews was discovered in the freezer. She had suffered severe frostbite to her extremities, requiring the amputation of nine toes and several skin grafts. Crews sued Brown, Foodcraft, and Calvary. An expert witness opined that improper assembly of the freezer’s seal or latch had caused frost to accumulate on the door’s latch, preventing the latch from working correctly. Among other things, Crews alleged that Foodcraft breached the implied warranties of merchantability by selling and installing the freezer. Foodcraft filed a motion for summary judgment, arguing that Crews could not sue Foodcraft for these alleged breaches because Crews lacked contractual privity with Foodcraft. The trial court granted Foodcraft’s motion. Crews appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Greene, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 177,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.