Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Dept. of Health
United States Supreme Court
497 U.S. 261 (1990)
Nancy Beth Cruzan was rendered incompetent and left in a persistent vegetative state as a result of severe injuries sustained during an automobile accident. Co-plaintiffs Lester and Joyce Cruzan, Nancy’s parents and co-guardians, sought a court order in Missouri state court against the Director of the Missouri Department of Health (defendant), directing the withdrawal of their daughter’s artificial feeding and hydration equipment. As support for their claim that Nancy would have wanted her artificial life support removed, the Cruzans cited a “somewhat serious” conversation Nancy had with her housemate friend at the age of twenty-five in which she said that if sick or injured, she “would not wish to continue her life unless she could live at least halfway normally.” The Missouri trial court found that a person in Nancy’s condition has a fundamental right under the state and federal constitutions to refuse or direct the withdrawal of “death-prolonging procedures.” The Supreme Court of Missouri reversed, holding that because there was no clear and convincing evidence of Nancy’s desire to have life-sustaining treatment withdrawn under such circumstances, her parents lacked authority to effectuate such a request. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Rehnquist, C.J.)
Concurrence (O’Connor, J.)
Concurrence (Scalia, J.)
Dissent (Brennan, J.)
Dissent (Stevens, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 153,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,400 briefs, keyed to 183 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.