United States Supreme Court
563 U.S. ___ (2011)
Pinholster (defendant) was convicted of murder and sentenced to death. He then filed an ineffective assistance of counsel claim. Specifically, Pinholster claimed that his attorney’s investigation into mitigating factors was inadequate. The attorney, aware of the need to find mitigating factors and that Pinholster was psychotic and did not endear himself to the jury, interviewed Pinholster’s family and a psychiatrist to find mitigating factors. The attorney determined, however, to call only Pinholster’s mother during sentencing—employing a well-known “family-sympathy mitigation defense,” in which the attorney uses a close family member to garner sympathy from the jury. The district court denied Pinholster’s claim. The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Thomas, J.)
Dissent (Sotomayor, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 202,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.