From our private database of 28,700+ case briefs...
D'Agostino v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc.
New Jersey Supreme Court
133 N.J. 516, 628 A.2d 305 (1993)
Richard D’Agostino (plaintiff) was a United States citizen who resided in Switzerland. D’Agostino was employed by Cilag, a Swiss subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson, Inc. (defendant), a pharmaceutical manufacturer based in New Jersey. D’Agostino contended he was hired through the efforts of New Jersey-based Johnson & Johnson and its agents. D’Agostino was an at-will employee, and his contract stated it would be governed by Swiss law. Part of D’Agostino’s job was to register new Cilag products with Swiss authorities, which was a step toward obtaining approval for sale of the products in the United States. During the registration process, D’Agostino was instructed by a Swiss supervisor at Cilag to make a payment to a member of the regulatory agency involved in the registration process. D’Agostino refused to make the payment because he considered it a bribe. As a result, his employment was terminated. D’Agostino filed suit against Johnson & Johnson for wrongful termination in New Jersey state court. In the suit, D’Agostino contended that the order to make the payment, as well as his firing when he refused to do so, were orchestrated by Johnson & Johnson in New Jersey. The trial court granted partial summary judgment in favor of D’Agostino, applying New Jersey law, under which the payment would have been a violation of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) and D’Agostino’s termination for refusal to make the payment would have been illegal. The appellate division reversed, applying Swiss law, under which the payment could be considered a proper consulting fee and D’Agostino’s termination would be lawful.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (O’Hern, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 546,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 546,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 28,700 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.