D & M Country Estates Homeowners Association v. Romriell
Idaho Supreme Court
59 P.3d 965 (2002)
Facts
Dwight and Denise Romriell (defendants) purchased property in the D & M subdivision. At the time of purchase, a single-family dwelling was located on the property. The Romriells planned to operate a group home for the elderly and wanted to house up to eight unrelated individuals. But the D & M subdivision had a restrictive covenant (the covenant) that prohibited the use of a dwelling by more than two families. The Romriells sought approval for their proposed group home by requesting an exception to the covenant. The D & M Country Estates Homeowners Association (the association) (plaintiff) rejected the Romriells’ request for an exception. Nevertheless, the Romriells began converting the single-family dwelling into a group home for the elderly. The association subsequently filed suit, alleging that the Romriells violated the covenant. The Romriells counterclaimed, contending that the covenant was invalid. The district court found that the covenant was valid and also found that the covenant prohibited the Romriells’ proposed group home for the elderly. The Romriells appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Trout, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 687,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 42,900 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.