Logourl black
From our private database of 13,300+ case briefs...

Day v. Sidley & Austin

United States District Court, District of Columbia
394 F. Supp. 986 (1976)


Facts

Day (plaintiff) was the senior underwriting partner in the Washington office of the Sidley & Austin law firm (S&A) (defendant). S&A’s partnership agreement, which Day signed, provided that all matters of firm policy would be decided by the executive committee, of which Day was not a member. In early 1972, S&A’s executive committee discussed merging S&A with another law firm (Lieberman Firm).  In July 1972, the merger was approved by a vote of S&A’s underwriting partners. Day himself voted in favor of the merger. After several more meetings of the underwriting partners, the terms of the merger were entered into an amended partnership agreement, which Day signed. Soon thereafter, the executive committee of the combined firm decided to move S&A’s office to a new location and appoint a former chairman of the Lieberman firm as co-chairman of the new firm. Day resigned soon thereafter, stating that the appointment of the co-chairman and office move made his job “intolerable.” Day subsequently filed suit against S&A, alleging that S&A violated its fiduciary duty by commencing merger negotiations without consulting non-executive committee partners, and by not informing those partners of the changes that would result from the merger.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Parker, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 147,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,300 briefs, keyed to 182 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.