Dillon v. Frazier
Supreme Court of South Carolina
678 S.E.2d 251 (2009)
Noel Dillon (plaintiff) was injured in a car accident caused by Neil Frazier (defendant). Dillon suffered ten broken ribs, a broken sternum, a broken clavicle, a broken thumb, and a punctured lung. As a result of the injuries, Dillon could not return to work for approximately ten weeks, and upon his return he could not work as many hours as he did prior to the accident. Dillon brought suit against Frazier. Frazier admitted fault for the accident. Dillon sought over $500,000 in damages, of which approximately $30,000 were not disputed, including medical bills, physical therapy bills, and lost wages. The jury awarded Dillon $6,000. Dillon filed a motion for a new trial nisi additur, or in the alternative, a new trial on damages. The trial court increased the damages award to $21,000. Dillon appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Pleicones, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 166,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.