Logourl black
From our private database of 13,800+ case briefs...

Eli Lilly & Co. v. Emisphere Techs., Inc.

United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
408 F. Supp. 2d 668 (S.D. Ind. 2006)


Facts

Eli Lilly & Co. (Lilly) (plaintiff) entered into a collaborative agreement with Emisphere Technologies, Inc. (Emisphere) (defendant), under which the parties would work together to use Emisphere’s technology to develop oral delivery of some of Lilly’s therapeutic compounds. The agreement necessitated and provided for a confidential exchange of proprietary information between the parties. In addition, Lilly exercised an option in the agreement to obtain an exclusive license to use Emisphere’s carrier technology to develop oral products. Lilly paid $4 million to exercise the option. While the collaborative research was ongoing, Lilly employees working on the research formed a secret team without Emisphere’s knowledge in order to apply Emisphere’s carrier technology to other Lilly compounds not contemplated in the agreement. After this secret research, Lilly filed for a patent for combinations of 56 delivery agents, including Emisphere’s carriers that Emisphere had divulged as part of the original collaborative contract. At this point, Emisphere terminated the original agreement and the subsequent license agreement. Lilly brought suit for breach of contract, arguing that the secret research could result in a patent infringement claim at most, but not termination of the agreements.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Hamilton, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 166,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.