ETW Corp. v. Jireh Publishing, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
332 F.3d 915 (2003)
ETW Corp. (plaintiff), the agency which represented professional golfer Tiger Woods, brought suit against Jireh Publishing, Inc. (Jireh) (defendant) for trademark infringement under the Lanham Act and other claims. Jireh marketed prints of a painting created by Rush which depicted Woods’ 1997 victory at The Masters Tournament in Augusta, Georgia, an image of Woods, the leader board, images of Woods’ caddy, and several images of previous winners. Additional materials included Woods’ name under the flap of the envelopes which contained the prints and in a narrative description of the print. ETW claimed that the Lanham Act protected the image of Woods and any marketing materials containing Woods’ name. The district court granted summary dismissal in favor of Jireh and ETW appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Graham, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 170,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.