Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Fina Oil & Chemical Co. v. Norton

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
332 F.3d 672 (D.C. Cir. 2003)


Facts

Fina Oil & Chemical Co. (Fina) (plaintiff) was a lessee of federal land. Fina Natural Gas Company (FNGC) was a gas reseller controlled by Fina. FNGC was not a marketing affiliate of Fina, however, because it also bought gas from other, non-affiliated entities. When Fina sold gas to FNGC, it paid royalties based on its sale price to FNGC. The Secretary of the U.S. Department of Interior (DOI) (defendant), however, ruled that gas sold by Fina to FNGC should be valued on the basis of FNGC’s resale price. The pertinent DOI regulation stated that gas sold by a lessee of federal land to a non-marketing affiliate was valued on the basis of “gross proceeds accruing to the lessee pursuant to a sale under its non-arm’s length contract . . . provided that those gross proceeds are equivalent to the gross proceeds derived from [comparable sales in the same field or area]”. The DOI found the term “lessee” to include all affiliates of Fina, including FNGC. Thus, according to the DOI, Fina was required to calculate royalties based on the gross proceeds accruing to FNGC after the resale. The relevant statute defined “lessee” as “any person to whom the United States . . . issues a lease.” Fina brought suit, challenging the DOI’s interpretation of its regulation. The district court affirmed the DOI’s interpretation. Fina appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Tatel, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 176,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.