From our private database of 37,200+ case briefs...
First Federal Savings & Loan Association of Pittsburgh v. Oppenheim, Appel, Dixon & Co.
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
110 F.R.D. 557 (1986)
Facts
After government-securities dealer Comark filed bankruptcy, customers who lost investments, including three savings-and-loan associations and a city (plaintiffs) sued Comark’s former auditor, Oppenheim, Appel, Dixon & Co. (OAD) (defendant). OAD impleaded Comark’s former general partners and attorneys, including general counsel Daniel Harkins and outside counsel (defendants). OAD alleged Harkins assisted in fraud by advising the partners to delay disclosing improperly commingled assets and giving regulatory officials misleading information. Harkins wanted to use attorney-client-privileged documents and testify about privileged discussions with Comark partners in his defense. A Comark partner objected, and the bankruptcy trustee asserted attorney-client privilege on Comark’s behalf, arguing Harkins had to establish the necessity of each piece of information. The court directed Harkins to submit all documents listed as privileged with an affidavit explaining the necessity of the documents and his proposed testimony for in camera review.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Dolinger, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 629,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 37,200 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.