From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...
Fisher v. University of Texas
United States Supreme Court
133 S.Ct. 2411 (2013)
Abigail Fisher (plaintiff), a Caucasian woman, was denied admission to the University of Texas (University) (defendant). Fisher filed suit against the University in federal district court, claiming that the University’s use of race in its admissions process violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The University had replaced a previously used race-based component in its admissions process with a Personal Achievement Index (PAI), which examined a student’s leadership, work experience, extra-curricular activities, and special circumstances like growing up in a single-parent household, speaking a language other than English at home, and the socioeconomic condition of the student’s family. At the same time, the Texas legislature had passed the Top Ten Percent Law (Top Ten), which permitted a student automatic admission to a state university or college if the student was in the top 10 percent of his or her Texas high school graduating class. Following the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306 (2003), the University had resumed making race an express factor in computing the PAI for students who were not admitted pursuant to the Top Ten formula. Because Fisher was not in the top 10 percent of her graduating class, she had sought admission pursuant to the University’s PAI. The district court granted summary judgment to the University. Fisher appealed. The court of appeals affirmed. The Court granted certiorari to review.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Kennedy, J.)
Concurrence (Thomas, J.)
Concurrence (Scalia, J.)
Dissent (Ginsburg, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 220,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.