From our private database of 37,200+ case briefs...
Force v. ITT Hartford Life & Annuity Insurance Co.
United States District Court for the District of Minnesota
4 F. Supp. 2d 843 (1998)
Facts
ITT Hartford Life & Annuity Insurance Co. (ITT Hartford) (defendant) developed new kinds of life insurance in which the insurance company invested premiums more aggressively and policyholders received higher returns. Liane Force and other class representatives (Force) (plaintiffs) brought a class-action suit against ITT for, among other claims, violations of Minnesota’s Consumer Fraud Act (CFA). Force claimed that ITT Hartford trained its sales agents to misrepresent the true nature of the life-insurance policies it was selling in order to increase ITT Hartford’s sales and profits. ITT moved to dismiss the claims under the CFA, arguing that an insurance policy is not merchandise and therefore does not fall within the scope of the CFA.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Kyle, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 630,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 37,200 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.