From our private database of 33,600+ case briefs...
Freundlich & Littman, LLC v. Feierstein
Pennsylvania Superior Court
157 A.3d 526 (2017)
The parties in this case were all attorneys. Freundlich & Littman, LLC, and Gregory Creed Littman, Esquire (collectively, Littman) (plaintiffs) were attorneys for a client in a negligence case against a client represented by Edward T. Feierstein (defendant), as well as Bruce Chasan and the Law Office of Bruce Chasan LLC (collectively, Chasan) (defendants). At the same time, an unrelated criminal matter was pending against Feierstein, and Littman’s brother was a key witness against Feierstein in that matter. Feierstein and Chasan filed a meritless counterclaim against Littman’s client in the negligence action. The judge in that case dismissed the counterclaim with prejudice, and Chasan and Feierstein did not appeal. At the same time, Feierstein sent two emails to Littman insulting Littman and his brother numerous times. The negligence case went to arbitration, Littman’s client won the arbitration, Feierstein and Chasan filed appeals, and the parties eventually settled. During this process, Feierstein and Chasan continued to send many threatening and insulting emails to Littman. Littman then filed suit against Feierstein and Chasan, alleging that the counterclaim was not filed as a litigation strategy but was instead intended to retaliate against Littman’s brother for testifying against Feierstein and to intimidate Littman into dropping the negligence case against Feierstein and Chasan’s client. Littman asserted claims for wrongful use of proceeding under Pennsylvania’s Dragonetti Act and a common-law claim for abuse of proceedings. Feierstein and Chasan sought a demurrer of the complaint, arguing that judicial privilege applied. The trial court dismissed the complaint, and Littman appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Bender, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 603,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 603,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.