Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Gagliardi v. TriFoods International, Inc.

Delaware Chancery Court
683 A.2d 1049 (1996)


Facts

Eugene Gagliardi (plaintiff) founded TriFoods International, Inc. (TriFoods). Gagliardi was fired from the company in 1993, but he continued to own 13 percent of the company’s stock. Following Gagliardi’s termination, Gagliardi claimed that TriFoods had severely deteriorated due to several poor business decisions by the board of directors (defendants) and management. First, Gagliardi was unhappy that TriFoods had purchased a manufacturing plant in Pomfret, Connecticut and borrowed funds to do so. Second, TriFoods had purchased and renovated a new research facility that Gagliardi claimed was a duplication of an existing research facility. Third, in 1994, TriFoods purchased the exclusive rights to produce and sell a food product known as Steak-umms. Gagliardi claimed that TriFoods had overpaid for Steak-umms. Fourth, TriFoods had instituted a sales commission to increase volume, and Gagliardi claimed this action was reckless or grossly negligent. Fifth, Gagliardi claimed TriFoods failed to pay key suppliers. Sixth, Gagliardi contended that TriFoods had destroyed customer relationships by selling inferior products. Finally, Gagliardi was unhappy that TriFoods had spent $125,000 for a new name, logo, and packaging. In his capacity as an existing shareholder, Gagliardi sued the board of directors, alleging negligent mismanagement of the company. The board members filed a motion to dismiss the negligent mismanagement claim.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Allen, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 174,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.