Gargallo v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith
United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
918 F.2d 658 (6th Cir. 1990)
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith (Merrill Lynch) (plaintiff) sued Gargallo (defendant) in Ohio state court for collection of debt due for losses incurred by Gargallo in a margin brokerage account he opened with Merrill Lynch. Gargallo counterclaimed, alleging Merrill Lynch had caused his losses through negligence and misrepresentation and had violated federal securities law. The court dismissed Gargallo’s counterclaims with prejudice for failing to comply with Merrill Lynch’s discovery requests. Gargallo then filed a complaint in United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, re-alleging the violations of federal securities law which was dismissed on res judicata grounds. Gargallo appealed the dismissal of his suit.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Ryan, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 166,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.