Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Geo. M. McDonald & Co. v. Johns

114 P. 175 (1911)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 30,900+ case briefs...

Geo. M. McDonald & Co. v. Johns

Washington Supreme Court

114 P. 175 (1911)

Facts

George R. Johns was indebted to Geo. M. McDonald & Company for $2,210. Johns had executed three promissory notes in favor of McDonald. Johns was also indebted to Bechtol. Johns signed mortgages on a certain property in favor of both McDonald and Bechtol. As it related to McDonald, the mortgage was for the preexisting debt; McDonald did not pay any new consideration for the mortgage. Bechtol’s mortgage was signed and delivered prior to McDonald’s, but McDonald’s mortgage was recorded first. McDonald had no notice of Bechtol’s mortgage. McDonald claimed that it was a bona fide purchaser for value and that its mortgage thus took priority over Bechtol’s. The trial court held that McDonald was not a bona fide purchaser for value, because McDonald did not pay valid consideration for the mortgage. McDonald appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Dunbar, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 553,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 553,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 30,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 553,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 30,900 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership