Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Giboney v. Empire Storage & Ice Co.

United States Supreme Court
336 U.S. 490 (1949)


Facts

In Missouri’s Kansas City (the city), many of the city’s ice peddlers belonged to the Ice and Coal Drivers and Handlers Local Union (the union). In an effort to improve wages and work conditions for ice peddlers, members of the union (defendants) attempted to convince all of the city’s ice peddlers to join the union. However, when some ice peddlers refused to join the union, the defendants initiated a plan to pressure the city’s wholesale ice distributors to agree to only supply ice to union peddlers. Empire Storage & Ice Company (Empire) (plaintiff), an ice distributor, was the only company that continued to supply ice to non-union peddlers. The defendants began to picket outside of Empire’s offices. The defendants’ only complaint during these protests was that Empire continued to supply ice to non-union peddlers. Despite these protests, Empire still refused to comply. The protests adversely impacted Empire’s business, as many of Empire’s workers were members of the union and refused to carry out their deliveries. Empire filed for an injunction to enjoin the defendants’ picketing, arguing that the defendants were violating Missouri’s anti-trade-restraint statute. The trial court granted the injunction. The defendants appealed the injunction to the United States Supreme Court, arguing that the injunction violated their First Amendment right to peaceful protest.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Black, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 220,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.