Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Great Northern Oil Company v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company

Supreme Court of Minnesota
189 N.W.2d 404 (1971)


Facts

In August 1964, Great Northern Oil Company (Great) (plaintiff) obtained an insurance policy with St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company and other insurance companies (defendants). This policy covered business-interruption losses. The insurance policy also included a subrogation clause, which gave the defendants subrogation rights. While this policy was in effect, Great entered into an agreement with Litwin Corporation, Inc. (Litwin) for construction services. The agreement with Litwin had an exculpatory clause that provided that Litwin would not be held responsible for business-interruption losses. In 1967, Litwin’s negligence caused damage to Great’s property. Great sued the defendants, claiming that Litwin’s negligence caused it to suffer a substantial business-interruption loss. The defendants were responsible for business-interruption losses under the terms of the policy. In their answer, the defendants raised the defense that, by releasing Litwin from liability for business-interruption losses, Great had defeated the rights of the defendants to subrogation. As a result, the defendants claimed that Great could not collect under the policy. Great and the defendants cross-moved for summary judgment on the subrogation claim. The trial court granted Great’s motion for summary judgment and struck the defendants’ subrogation defenses. The defendants appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Rogosheske, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 218,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.