Supreme Court of Ohio
591 N.E.2d 696 (1992)
As a fetus, Candy Grover was exposed to DES, a drug manufactured by Eli Lilly & Company (Eli) (defendant). The drug was prescribed to Candy’s mother when she was pregnant with Candy, as a way to prevent miscarriage. The use of the drug was later banned after DES was determined to cause a rare form of cancer in female fetuses. Candy had a son, Charles Grover (plaintiff), who was born prematurely and diagnosed with cerebral palsy. Charles brought a products-liability suit against Eli, claiming that his health issues were caused by problems with Candy’s reproductive system that were caused by Candy’s mother’s ingestion of the drug. The United States District Court of the Northern District of Ohio certified to the Supreme Court of Ohio the question of whether a preconception tort was a cognizable claim.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Wright, J.)
Dissent (Resnick, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.