From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...
Hart v. Clayton-Parker & Associates, Inc.
United States District Court for the District of Arizona
869 F. Supp. 774 (1994)
J.C. Penney Company (J.C. Penney) issued Hart (plaintiff) a credit card. After she failed to pay her balance, J.C. Penney assigned the account to Clayton-Parker & Associates, Inc. (Clayton-Parker) (defendant) for collection. Hart brought a lawsuit against Clayton-Parker in federal court, alleging violations of the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) and Arizona laws against abusive debt collection practices. The court’s jurisdiction was based on the presence of a federal question; the parties were not diverse. Clayton-Parker counterclaimed against Hart for failing to pay her debt. Hart moved to dismiss the counterclaim on the ground that the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over it.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Broomfield, C.J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 218,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.