Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Head & Seemann, Inc. v. Gregg

104 Wis. 2d 156, 311 N.W.2d 667 (1981) aff'd and remanded, 107 Wis. 2d 126, 318 N.W.2d 381 (1982)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 32,200+ case briefs...

Head & Seemann, Inc. v. Gregg

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

104 Wis. 2d 156, 311 N.W.2d 667 (1981) aff'd and remanded, 107 Wis. 2d 126, 318 N.W.2d 381 (1982)

Facts

Bettye Gregg (defendant) offered to buy a home from Head & Seemann, Inc. (H&S) (plaintiff). Gregg fraudulently represented that she had $15,000 to $20,000 of equity in another home, which she would sell to pay for the H&S home. H&S relied on Gregg’s intentionally fraudulent representations, accepted her offer, and entered into a contract. After Gregg took possession, she failed to make payments. H&S sued for fraud, seeking rescission, ejectment, and recovery for five months’ lost use of the property and out-of-pocket expenses. In the alternative, H&S sued for breach of contract, seeking rescission, foreclosure, and ejectment. The trial court granted partial summary judgment for H&S, rescinding the contract for fraud. The trial court further ordered ejectment, which was stayed for two weeks pending Gregg’s voluntary removal, pursuant to a stipulation between the parties that if Gregg left within two weeks, H&S would agree to the dismissal of its claim for damages. Gregg did not leave within two weeks. The trial court entered a judgment of ejectment. Gregg subsequently sought dismissal of the damages claim based on the doctrine of election of remedies. The trial court held that the judgment of ejectment was an election of remedies that barred damages, and therefore dismissed the damages claim. H&S appealed, arguing that both ejectment and damages were necessary to restore H&S to its previous position before the contract. H&S argued that damages would not give H&S the benefit of the bargain or the purchase price and therefore should not be barred under the election-of-remedies doctrine.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Voss, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 585,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 585,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 32,200 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 585,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 32,200 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership