Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Hewitt v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.

490 F. Supp. 1358 (1980)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 33,600+ case briefs...

Hewitt v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia

490 F. Supp. 1358 (1980)

Facts

In 1966, John Hewitt married Barbara Ann Cullum. The couple lived together in both Texas and Maryland. In 1969, John left Barbara and married Nancy Anne Threatt Hewitt (plaintiff), who believed that John’s previous marriage was dissolved. In 1973, John and Barbara spoke about obtaining a divorce. According to Barbara, she met with a lawyer and sent John the necessary paperwork, but he never returned the documents. In 1977, John and Nancy were living in Virginia when John was killed in an automobile accident. After John’s death, Barbara applied to the Social Security Administration (administration) to receive John’s social-security benefits. The administration found no existence of a divorce decree between Barbara and John and awarded the benefits to Barbara. After John’s death, Nancy and the administrator of John’s estate, Jerome L. Lonnes (plaintiff) sued Firestone Tire and Rubber Company (defendant) for its role in the accident and received $400,000 in settlement funds. However, the court became aware that two women, both of whom had children with John, claimed to be John’s surviving spouse. A hearing was held to determine who was the surviving spouse under Virginia’s Death by Wrongful Act statute. Barbara testified that John had never obtained the divorce decree, but she was unable to corroborate her testimony with the name of the lawyer she consulted or with copies of the documents she received. Barbara also argued that John could not have obtained a divorce between the time he left her and when he married Nancy. Additionally, Barbara tried to use the fact that the administration was unable to find any divorce decree as evidence that no divorce was obtained, but the evidence was inadmissible for failure to adhere to the rules of evidence.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Warriner, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 603,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 603,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 603,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 33,600 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership