Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status
From our private database of 16,300+ case briefs...

Higgins v. Commissioner

United States Supreme Court
312 U.S. 212 (1941)


Facts

Higgins (plaintiff) had substantial holdings in both real estate and securities. He set up offices in New York and Paris and hired employees dedicated to overseeing his investments. His staff handled the day-to-day responsibilities related to the investments under Higgins’ close supervision. Their responsibilities included keeping records and collecting interest and dividends. Higgins relied on these offices in this manner for over thirty years. In 1932 and 1933, Higgins deducted the salaries of his employees and other expenditures related to his two offices as ordinary and necessary business expenses. The Commissioner (defendant) disallowed the deductions on the grounds that personal investment activities did not constitute the carrying on of a business. However, the Commissioner conceded to the Board of Tax Appeals that Higgins’ real estate activities constituted a business. The Board of Tax Appeals held that insofar as the expenditures related to Higgins’ real estate, the expenditures were deductible. The activities related to his securities, on the other hand, did not constitute the carrying on of a business and were non-deductible. Accordingly, the Board of Tax Appeals ordered the apportionment of Higgins’ expenses between his real estate and securities operations. The Court of Appeals affirmed. The Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Reed, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 370,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 16,300 briefs, keyed to 223 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions & Answers


Why was the realty management conceded to be a business, while the management of the taxpayer's other investments was not?

Want to see this answer?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and get access to all answers in our Q&A database

Sign up for a FREE 7-day trial

Tempor minim nulla id mollit ullamco consequat aliquip adipisicing irure officia tempor. Magna sit eiusmod laborum proident laboris ex sunt. Non labore ex officia irure qui et laboris aliqua in minim. Labore velit aliqua proident officia cillum occaecat dolore tempor. Ullamco in consequat labore amet laborum proident reprehenderit anim cillum excepteur. Elit do nostrud nisi excepteur sit dolor pariatur fugiat. Nisi incididunt incididunt do est velit excepteur enim excepteur incididunt mollit pariatur. Irure tempor non in esse do. Laboris eiusmod in ad ut enim est duis ad sint veniam eiusmod.