Logourl black
From our private database of 13,800+ case briefs...

Hodel, Sec. of the Interior v. Irving

United States Supreme Court
481 U.S. 704 (1987)


Facts

In the late 19th century, Congress enacted a series of laws dividing the ownership of Indian reservations. Under those laws, portions of the reservations were allotted to individual tribe members with restrictions on how they could dispose of the property: the tribe members could dispose of their property interests by will in accordance with regulations promulgated by the Secretary of the Interior (defendant); otherwise the interests would pass to the tribe members’ descendants. The laws did not work as Congress had intended. The property ownership interests became divided among increasing numbers of heirs in increasingly complex ways. Because most of the properties were rented out and the rent needed to be divided proportionally among the owners, the administrative costs skyrocketed. For example, one Sioux tribe averaged 196 owners per allotted tract of land, and many owners received only pennies per year in rent because their shares were so small. In 1983, Congress passed the Indian Land Consolidation Act, which provided that all ownership interests constituting less than two percent of the area of a tract or earning less than $100 in the previous year would escheat (pass) to the tribe when the owner died. Several members of the Oglala Sioux tribe (plaintiffs) brought suit against the Secretary of Interior, claiming that the statute effected takings without just compensation, in violation of the Fifth Amendment. The district court ruled the Act constitutional. This was reversed by the court of appeals on the grounds that controlling disposition of the property at death represented a taking. The Secretary appealed to the Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (O’Connor, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 166,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.