Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Hopson v. Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas
2009 WL 1124389 (2009)


Facts

Karissa Lou Hopson (defendant) was arrested after police found her standing on the front porch of a house, holding a television. When the police arrived, they saw that the house’s windows were broken and that Hopson had blood on her shirt and hand. There was also damage to the inside of the house. Hopson was subsequently charged with burglary. Hopson testified that she picked up the television because she believed she was stopping a burglary in progress, not because she intended to commit a burglary. Hopson said that she had gone by the house and found a man taking things out of the house. In fact, the owners had given the man permission to go inside and pick up some of his belongings. Hopson testified that the man left after she confronted him, and that she then found the television sitting outside. Believing that the man had taken the television out of the house as part of a burglary, Hopson picked up the television to put it back in the house. Hopson maintained that her intention was not to commit a burglary, but to prevent one. Hopson asked the trial court to instruct the jury on the mistake-of-fact defense, but the trial court refused. The jury convicted Hopson. Hopson appealed, arguing that the trial court erred when it refused to offer the mistake-of-fact instruction to the jury.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Sullivan, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 177,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.