Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Hospital Corporation of America v. Federal Trade Commission

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
807 F.2d 1381 (1986)


Facts

Hospital Corporation of America (Hospital Corp.) (defendant) was a hospital chain. Hospital Corp. owned a hospital in Chattanooga, Tennessee. In 1981 and 1982, Hospital Corp. acquired two additional hospitals in Chattanooga. The acquisitions also gave Hospital Corp. management contracts for two more hospitals in Chattanooga. Accordingly, after the acquisitions, Hospital Corp. controlled five of the 11 hospitals in Chattanooga. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) (plaintiff) filed a complaint against Hospital Corp. The FTC alleged that Hospital Corp.’s acquisitions violated § 7 of the Clayton Act, because the transactions substantially lessened competition in the Chattanooga hospital-services market. The FTC demonstrated that Hospital Corp.’s market share increased from 14 percent to 26 percent. The combined market share of the four biggest hospitals in the Chattanooga market increased from 79 percent to 91 percent. The FTC presented additional evidence of Chattanooga hospitals’ cooperative tradition and other economic aspects of the hospital-services market that showed a market prone to collusion. Hospital Corp. argued the mergers did not threaten competition, because differences in services and organizational structure made collusion difficult or unappealing. Hospital Corp. also argued the fact that hospitals are paid mainly by sophisticated insurance companies deters anticompetitive collusion. The FTC ruled that Hospital Corp.’s acquisitions violated § 7 of the Clayton Act. Hospital Corp. appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Posner, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 219,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.