In re Catapult Entertainment
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
165 F.3d 747 (1999)
Catapult Entertainment, Inc. (Catapult) (plaintiff), an online gaming company, was formed in 1994. It entered into two nonexclusive license agreements with Stephen Perlman (defendant), which gave Catapult the right to exploit certain technologies, including patents and patent applications. In October 1996, Catapult filed a petition for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. The company continued to operate as a debtor-in-possession. Not long before filing its petition, Catapult agreed to merge with Mpath Interactive, Inc. (Mpath). The effect of the merger would be to make Catapult a wholly owned subsidiary of Mpath. As part of its reorganization plan, Catapult moved the bankruptcy court to approve its assumption of approximately 140 executory contracts and unexpired leases, including the contracts with Perlman. Perlman objected, but the court granted the motion and approved the plan. The district court affirmed the decision of the bankruptcy court. Perlman appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Fletcher, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 170,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.