Logourl black
From our private database of 13,300+ case briefs...

In Re Radom & Neidorff, Inc.

Court of Appeals of New York
119 N.E.2d 563 (1954)


Facts

Radom & Neidorff, Inc. was successfully operated by David Radom (plaintiff) and his brother-in-law Henry Neidorff, who were the corporation’s sole and equal stockholders. Upon Henry’s death in 1950, his shares passed to Radom’s sister, Anna Neidorff (Neidorff) (defendant). Several months after Henry’s death Radom petitioned the court for dissolution of the corporation under section 103 of New York’s General Corporation Law. Radom’s petition acknowledged that the corporation was solvent and successful, but alleged that, since Henry’s death, Neidorff has refused to cooperate with Radom and had refused to sign Radom’s salary checks, and that election of directors at the stockholders’ meeting had been impossible due to disagreements between them. The trial court held that Radom’s petition showed an irreconcilable conflict between the two stockholders that required dissolution, if the petition’s allegations were proven. Neidorff appealed, and the appellate division reversed and dismissed the petition, noting that the corporation’s profits had increased; its assets had tripled while the case was pending; and Radom’s failure to receive a salary did not frustrate the corporation’s business and could be remedied by methods other than dissolution. Radom now appeals.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Desmond, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Dissent (Fuld, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 136,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,300 briefs, keyed to 182 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.