Johnson & Johnson * Merck Consumer Pharmaceuticals Co. v. SmithKline Beecham Corp.
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
960 F.2d 94 (2d Cir. 1992)
Johnson & Johnson * Merck Consumer Pharmaceuticals Co. (J&J) (plaintiff) manufactured Mylanta, an antacid that contained aluminum and did not contain calcium. SmithKline Beecham Corp. (SmithKline) (defendant) manufactured a competing product, Tums, that contained calcium and did not contain aluminum. SmithKline made a television commercial comparing the ingredients of the antacids. The commercial stated that Mylanta contained aluminum, and emphasized that Tums contained calcium. J&J brought suit under the Lanham Act in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (District Court), alleging that the commercials portrayed a false or misleading message. Specifically, J&J alleged that the commercial played off of a common public misperception that digestion of aluminum caused Alzheimer’s disease. At trial, J&J introduced a consumer survey of 300 antacid users who were shown the commercial. Two of the questions asked were “Aside from trying to get you to buy the product, what are the main ideas the commercial communicates to you?” and “What other ideas does the commercial communicate to you?” In response to these questions 18 people out of 300 stated that Tums’s competitors’ products contained ingredients that were bad for you. Six of those 18 responded specifically that aluminum was not good for you. Three others responded negatively about aluminum, generally. The survey also asked more leading questions about aluminum that the District Court found to be unpersuasive. The District Court found in favor of SmithKline and dismissed the complaint. J&J appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Walker, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 166,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.