Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Johnson v. Johnson

Supreme Court of New Jersey
9 A.3d 1003 (N.J. 2010)


Facts

David Johnson (defendant) and Molly Johnson (plaintiff) were divorced with two children. A divorce decree was entered, awarding joint legal custody of the children to David and Molly. David and Molly struggled with scheduling physical custody of the children. As a result, David and Molly agreed to resolve the scheduling issues via arbitration. David and Molly signed a thorough agreement, generally detailing what they expected of the arbitrator’s decision and the arbitration process. The agreement stated that there would be no formal transcript of the arbitration proceedings and that the arbitrator’s detailed decision called for in the agreement would constitute the entire record of the proceedings. During the proceedings, the arbitrator produced a detailed recapitulation of each interview and observation and issued a full and detailed decision in accordance with all procedures agreed upon by the Johnsons. However, Molly disagreed with the decision and filed a petition to have the arbitrator removed. The trial court upheld the arbitrator’s decision. The appellate court reversed, finding that because the arbitrator had not kept a verbatim transcript of testimony, there was insufficient evidence on which the court could review the decision. As a result, the appellate court remanded the case for a plenary hearing. David appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Long, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.