Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Jolly v. Eli Lilly & Co.

Supreme Court of California
751 P.2d 923 (1988)


Facts

Jolly (plaintiff) was in utero when her mother took the synthetic drug estrogen diethylstilbestrol (DES) to prevent miscarriage. Jolly was born in 1951. Jolly learned in 1972 that a mother’s use of DES while pregnant could harm her fetus. Jolly went to a medical clinic, where she was diagnosed with a precancerous condition. By 1976, Jolly’s condition had developed into cancer. Jolly had some affected tissue surgically removed, and in 1978, she underwent a hysterectomy and partial vaginectomy to eliminate the cancer. Jolly was unable to learn the source of the DES prescribed to her mother. However, in 1980 the Supreme Court of California held in Sindell v. Abbott Laboratories, 607 P.2d 924 (1980), that victims who were unable to identify the source of their mothers’ DES could instead state a cause of action against DES manufacturers who produced a substantial market share of the drug. Less than one year after the Sindell decision, Jolly sued a number of DES manufacturers (defendants). The California Code of Civil Procedure § 340 (3) placed a one-year statute of limitations on suits for tortious injuries. The defendants moved for summary judgment, arguing that Jolly’s suit was time barred. The trial court granted the defendants’ motion. Jolly appealed. The court of appeals reversed and remanded. The defendants appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Panelli, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 174,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.