Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Kelly v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.

11 F. Supp. 497 (1935)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 35,600+ case briefs...

Kelly v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.

United States District Court for the Southern District of New York

11 F. Supp. 497 (1935)

Facts

In 1929 Insull Utility Investments, Inc. (Insull) issued debentures. The debentures contained negative-pledge clauses forbidding Insull from pledging any of its property in a way that subordinated the debenture holders’ security interests in Insull. After issuing the debentures, Insull took out short-term loans from banks in New York (the New York banks) (defendants) that were secured by pledges of stock owned by Insull. Insull went bankrupt, and the stock pledged to the New York banks was transferred to the banks. A debenture holder (the plaintiff debenture holder) (plaintiff) filed a lawsuit in federal district court on behalf of all other debenture holders against the New York banks, seeking a return of the stock so that the stock could be distributed with the rest of the bankruptcy estate. The plaintiff debenture holder argued that (1) the debentures placed an equitable lien on all of Insull’s assets, (2) the negative-pledge clauses created equitable servitudes on Insull’s assets that prohibited Insull from pledging its assets in a way that subordinated the debenture holders’ security interest in Insull’s assets, (3) the New York banks knew of the negative-pledge clauses and induced Insull to breach the clauses, and (4) the debenture holders could enforce their rights under the negative-pledge clauses against the New York banks. The New York banks opposed the case, arguing that they could not be held liable for Insull’s alleged breach of the negative-pledge clauses.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Mack, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 618,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 618,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 618,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 35,600 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership