Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
United States Supreme Court
133 S. Ct. 1351 (2013)
Supap Kirtsaeng (defendant) purchased text books written in English in Thailand. The books were published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (Wiley) (plaintiff) and printed outside of the United States. Kirtsaeng imported the books into the United States for resale. Wiley sued in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York for violations of the Copyright Act of 1976 (the Act). Kirtsaeng raised a first-sale doctrine defense under the holding of Quality King Distributors, Inc. v. L’anza Research International, Inc., 523 U.S. 135 (1998) (Quality King). The district court ruled that the first-sale defense did not apply to goods produced outside the United States. The court of appeals affirmed. Kirtsaeng appealed, and the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Breyer, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 176,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.