Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Kotch v. Board of River Port Pilot Commissioners

United States Supreme Court
330 U.S. 552 (1947)


Facts

Under Louisiana law, all seagoing vessels entering or leaving the port of New Orleans were required to be boarded and navigated by state-appointed pilots. A pilot could be certified by the Board of River Port Pilot Commissioners for the Port of New Orleans (Board) (defendant) if the pilot met certain minimum requirements and served a six-month apprenticeship with an experienced pilot. Kotch and other individuals (plaintiffs) sought certification as pilots with the Board but lacked the requisite six-month apprenticeship. The plaintiffs challenged the requirements of the pilotage law, claiming that the incumbent pilots in New Orleans, who had complete discretion in selecting apprentices, almost exclusively selected apprentices from among their friends and relatives. The plaintiffs claimed that the pilotage system resulted in nepotism in violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Supreme Court of Louisiana found that the pilotage law as administered in Louisiana did not violate the Equal Protection Clause.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Black, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Dissent (Rutledge, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 177,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.