From our private database of 13,000+ case briefs...
Kozlowski v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts
73 F.R.D. 73 (D. Mass. 1976)
Kozlowski (plaintiff) brought a products liability suit against Sears, Roebuck & Co. (Sears) (defendant) after he was severely burned when Sears’s pajamas he was wearing “was caused to ignite.” Kozlowski filed a motion to compel discovery of a record of other complaints or discussions involving personal injury caused by Sears’s pajamas. A federal magistrate order compelled production of the records, but Sears did not produce. Kozlowski filed a motion for entry of default judgment which was granted by the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts. Sears filed a motion to remove the default judgment, claiming that production of all of such records was impractical and nearly impossible.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Julian, S.D.J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 129,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,000 briefs, keyed to 177 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.