From our private database of 14,200+ case briefs...
Kupferman v. Consolidated Research & Manufacturing Co.
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
459 F.2d 1072 (2d Cir. 1972)
In 1961, Vickers, Christy & Co. (Vickers, Christy), an underwriter, was unable to pay its debts and became insolvent, and Kupferman (plaintiff) was appointed as the receiver, managing the company’s matters through its insolvency. Among Vickers, Christy’s assets were 12,500 shares in Consolidated Research and Management Co. (Consolidated) (defendant) that the company had received pursuant to an underwriting agreement in 1960; however, by 1962, these shares had lost much of their value. Kupferman filed suit against Consolidated based on these shares, alleging that Consolidated had not complied with SEC filing requirements. During the course of preparing for litigation, Kupferman’s attorney, Ross, found an agreement between Vickers, Christy and Consolidated, releasing Consolidated from liability for breach based on the lost value of the shares. Ross did not disclose this document to Consolidated, and in 1962 Kupferman won a judgment against Consolidated. Because Consolidated did not have enough corporate assets, the judgment was unenforceable. Kupferman brought suit against the directors to satisfy the judgment. In 1971, during the course of that litigation, one of Consolidated’s directors, Jacobsen, found the release executed by Vickers, Christy and Consolidated. Jacobsen filed a motion to vacate the 1962 judgment against Consolidated. The court denied the motion to vacate the judgment, and Jacobsen appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Friendly, C.J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 240,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.