Logourl black

L. Albert & Son v. Armstrong Rubber Co.

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
178 F.2d 182 (2d Cir. 1949)


Facts

L. Albert & Son (Albert) (plaintiff) contracted in December 1942 with Armstrong Rubber Co. (Armstrong) (defendant) to sell four machines designed to recondition old rubber. Albert delivered two of the four machines in August 1943, but did not deliver the other two machines until the middle of 1945. Because of this delay, Armstrong refused to accept all four of the machines. Albert brought suit for breach of contract and Armstrong counterclaimed for Albert’s delay in delivery. The trial court dismissed both claims, but ruled in favor of Albert in the amount of the value of a part of the machines that Armstrong actually had put to use. Both parties appealed. Armstrong claimed damages incurred due to its reliance on Albert’s promise, including the $3,000 cost of the foundation it laid for the machines.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Hand, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.