Lakshmi Grocery & Gas, Inc. v. GRJH, Inc.
New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
30 N.Y.S.3d 743 (2016)
Ravinder Sharma and Yosho Lakshmi (plaintiffs) owned Lakshmi Grocery & Gas Inc. (plaintiff). GRJH, Inc. (defendant) was run by James and Alicia Metz. Having successfully dealt with the Metzses on prior business matters, the parties entered negotiations to lease a gas station and convenience store. In response to numerous requests from Sharma, Alicia Metz emailed that the convenience store had made $22,000 in inside sales for the prior month, August of that year. However, Alicia had actually sent the figures from the prior August and mistakenly labeled them as that year’s sales. The actual sales from August of that year were only $15,500. Sharma claimed that he also asked to look at the store’s sales records directly, but Alicia had denied access to the records, only allowing Sharma to visit the store as an anonymous customer. Alicia denied that Sharma had ever requested the sale records, but she confirmed that it was their policy to prevent potential new lessors from talking to employees to avoid unrest until the deal was complete. Relying on the parties’ prior dealings and the representation about $22,000 in inside sales just the month before, Sharma agreed to the lease. After the deal, Sharma learned about the actual sales figures. Sharma contended that he never would have entered the lease if he had known the true number. Unable to reach an agreement about modifying the lease, Sharma and Lakshmi vacated the store and sued to rescind the contract. The trial court found that there was a substantial mutual mistake about the inside-sales number and rescinded the lease contract, awarding damages to Sharma and Lakshmi as part of the rescission. GRJH appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Garry, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 726,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 726,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,700 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.