Logourl black
From our private database of 12,700+ case briefs...

Levy v. Kosher Overseers Assoc. of America, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
104 F.3d 38 (1997)


Facts

Rabbi Don Yoel Levy and Eliezer Levy (Levy) (plaintiff) own and operate a company that certified certain food manufacturers as kosher for use by Jewish individuals. Levy, one of many kosher certifying organizations, had its own unique mark that it placed on food products it certified as kosher. Each organization employs its own unique standards for what constitutes a kosher product, so it is important for consumers to understand which organization certifies a given food product. Kosher marks are protected by trademark law and are registered with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Levy held a trademark for its mark since 1965. The Kosher Overseers Association of America (KOA) (defendant) sought to register its own kosher marking in 1989 with the Patent and Trademark Office. Levy contested the application, arguing that KOA’s mark was too similar to Levy’s. The Patent and Trademark Office’s Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) heard the matter and, after comparing the two marks, refused to register KOA’s mark. Following the TTAB’s holding, KOA continued to use the mark on products it certified. Levy sued KOA in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York seeking to permanently enjoin KOA from using the mark. Levy argued that the use of such a mark would constitute trademark infringement. Levy moved for summary judgment, arguing that the TTAB decision constituted collateral estoppel. The district court agreed and granted a permanent injunction on KOA. KOA appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Cabranes, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 120,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 12,700 briefs, keyed to 172 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.