Los Angeles Department of Water & Power v. Manhart
United States Supreme Court
435 U.S. 702 (1978)
The Los Angeles Department of Water & Power (Department) (defendant) administered employee benefits programs, including pensions, funded entirely by contributions from each employee and the Department. Department calculations indicated that female employees tended to outlive male employees by several years, thus requiring the Department to pay out, on the whole, greater pension benefits to female retirees than to male retirees. To account for this difference, the Department required female employees to make monthly contributions to their individual funds that were nearly 15 percent higher than the contributions required of similarly situated male employees. As a result, because contributions were withheld from each employee’s paychecks, female employees were taking home less money per month than same-salaried male employees.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Stevens, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.