From our private database of 28,700+ case briefs...
M&G Polymers USA v. Tackett
United States Supreme Court
135 S.Ct. 926, 190 L.Ed.2d 809 (2015)
M & G Polymers, USA (M&G) (defendant) entered into a master collective-bargaining agreement (CBA) and a Pension, Insurance, and Service Award Agreement (P&I) with union workers employed at one of the M&G plants. The contract language in the CBA and P&I stated that union workers “will receive full Company contribution towards the cost of” healthcare benefits upon retirement. When the CBA and P&I were renewed, M&G amended the contracts to require retirees to contribute to their healthcare benefits upon retirement. Hobert Tackett and other retirees from M&G (plaintiffs), along with their surviving spouses and dependents (plaintiffs), filed suit against M&G in federal district court for breach of contract and violations of the Labor Management Relations Act and the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. The plaintiffs claimed that M&G had promised to provide lifetime, contribution-free healthcare benefits. The district court dismissed the suit for failure to state a claim. The plaintiffs appealed. The court of appeals reversed, relying on UAW v. Yard-Man, 716 F.2d 1476 (6th Cir. 1983), and held that the phrase “will receive” in the CBA and P&I indicated an intent by M&G to vest the plaintiffs with lifetime benefits. On remand, the district court held in favor of the plaintiffs and issued a permanent injunction ordering M&G to reinstate contribution-free healthcare benefits for the plaintiffs. M&G appealed. The court of appeals affirmed. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari to review.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Thomas, J.)
Concurrence (Ginsburg, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 546,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 546,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 28,700 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.