Martin v. Little, Brown & Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
450 A.2d 984 (Super.Pa. 1981)
James Martin (plaintiff) sent a letter to Little, Brown & Co. (Little) (defendant) in which he told Little that portions of one of its books, How to Buy Stocks, had been plagiarized by another book. Martin gave Little the name of the other book and the passages that were copied from How to Buy Stocks. The information from Martin was unsolicited by Little, and compensation for the information was never requested or discussed. Little filed a copyright infringement against the plagiarizing party and upon hearing this, Martin demanded compensation from Little for his information and then filed suit to obtain it. The trial court dismissed Martin’s suit. Martin appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Wieand, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.