Mastercrafters Clock & Radio Co. v. Vacheron & Constantin-Le Coultre Watches, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
221 F.2d 464 (1955)
Facts
Vacheron & Constantin-Le Coultre Watches, Inc. (defendant) imported a Swiss-made cordless luxury clock called the Atmos. The Atmos’s design was well-known, unique, and had a prestigious reputation. The clock retailed for $175. Mastercrafters Clock & Radio Company (plaintiff) manufactured a “Model 308” clock. The Model 308 looked similar to the Atmos, although it used an electrical cord and had Mastercrafters’s name on it. The Model 308 retailed for $30-$40. Mastercrafters filed suit seeking a declaratory injunction that its clock did not unfairly compete with Vacheron. Vacheron filed a counterclaim seeking to enjoin Mastercrafters from selling the Model 308. Vacheron argued that the Model 308 harmed the reputation of the Atmos and, as a result, its sales. Vacheron presented as evidence customer statements about the clocks, including a statement that a customer “could get a clock for $30 or $40 just like the Atmos,” and references to “the lower-priced Atmos.” The district court ruled in favor of Mastercrafters. The court did not find unfair competition in part due to Mastercrafters’s name appearing on the Model 308. Vacheron appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Frank, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 710,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 44,600 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
