United States Supreme Court
463 U.S. 1032 (1983)
David Long (defendant) was stopped by police. Although police did not have probable cause for an arrest, they did have reason to believe that the car Long was driving might have dangerous weapons inside. Thus, police conducted a protective search of the passenger area and trunk of the car. Police discovered marijuana during the search, and Long was charged with possession. Long moved to suppress the marijuana found in the car, but the trial court denied the motion. Long was convicted. Long’s appeal reached the Michigan Supreme Court, which reversed on the ground that the search went beyond that permitted by Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968). The Michigan Supreme Court concluded that the marijuana was therefore fruit of the poisonous tree and suppressed the evidence. The State of Michigan appealed to the United States Supreme Court. Long argued that the U.S. Supreme Court had no jurisdiction to review the ruling, because the Michigan Supreme Court’s decision rested on independent and adequate state grounds.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (O’Connor, J.)
Dissent (Stevens, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 237,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.