Logourl black
From our private database of 13,300+ case briefs...

Minneapolis Star & Tribune Co. v. Minnesota Commissioner of Revenue

United States Supreme Court
460 U.S. 575 (1983)


Facts

In 1967, the Minnesota Commissioner of Revenue (defendant) imposed a sales tax on most sales of goods. The Minneapolis Star & Tribune Co. (plaintiff) publishes a morning and evening newspaper in Minneapolis, Minnesota. From 1967 to 1971, it enjoyed an exemption from the sales and use tax provided for Minnesota publications. In 1971, the Minnesota legislature amended its tax scheme to impose a “use tax” on the cost of paper and ink products consumer in production of a publication. The scheme was later amended to exempt the first $100,000 worth of ink and paper consumed in a calendar year. After this exemption was enacted, eleven publishers produced enough paper to incur a tax liability. Minneapolis Star & Tribune Co. (Star Tribune) (plaintiff) was one of the eleven, and paid almost two-thirds of the total revenue raised by the tax. The following year, the Star & Tribune again bore roughly two-thirds of the total receipts from the use tax on ink and paper. The Star & Tribune sued the Minnesota Commissioner of Revenue (defendant) and alleged that the tax improperly burdened its freedom of press. The Minnesota Supreme Court upheld the tax as constitutional. The Star & Tribune appealed to the United States Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (O’Connor, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Dissent (Rehnquist, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 136,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,300 briefs, keyed to 182 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.