Mitchell v. United States
United States Supreme Court
526 U.S. 314 (1999)
In 1995, Amanda Mitchell (defendant) pled guilty in federal court to distributing cocaine. Mitchell did not have a plea agreement and reserved the right at sentencing to challenge the drug quantity for which she was responsible. During the guilty plea, the district court advised Mitchell that she was waiving her Fifth Amendment right to remain silent at trial by pleading guilty. When asked if she had committed the acts necessary to be found guilty, Mitchell responded, “Some of it.” At the sentencing hearing, the United States government (plaintiff) offered witnesses who testified regarding Mitchell’s role in drug dealing and generally to the amounts she handled. Mitchell did not testify or offer evidence at sentencing, but her counsel argued that the prosecution could only attribute a minimal amount of drugs to her. The district court ruled that Mitchell did not have the right to remain silent at sentencing and expressly held her silence against her in sentencing her to the mandatory 10-year sentence for selling more than five kilograms of cocaine. The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Kennedy, J.)
Dissent (Thomas, J.)
Dissent (Scalia, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.